<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Beacon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engageinpr.com/2007/11/29/facebook-beacon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engageinpr.com/2007/11/29/facebook-beacon/</link>
	<description>Engage in social media and PR</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Livingston</title>
		<link>http://www.engageinpr.com/2007/11/29/facebook-beacon/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engageinpr.com/2007/11/29/facebook-beacon/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Full disclosure: Verizon Wireless used to be a client of mine.  They are not an open culture. I doubt that they get it.  This is a reaction to Google and Cisco playing in the wireless space...  

As a former wireless reporter, I doubt either of these newbies really understands wireless either and I have serious doubts about Android.  Both Motorola and IBM tried to create wireless data networks in the nineties and they got their asses kicked by the conventional telephony cos.  

I see no reason why Cisco or Google will understand the dynamics of RF modeling and diverse device, RPU or any of the many other factors that go into creating a successful wireless business.  Mark my words, I think a little silcon valley humble pie is going to be dished out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full disclosure: Verizon Wireless used to be a client of mine.  They are not an open culture. I doubt that they get it.  This is a reaction to Google and Cisco playing in the wireless space&#8230;  </p>
<p>As a former wireless reporter, I doubt either of these newbies really understands wireless either and I have serious doubts about Android.  Both Motorola and IBM tried to create wireless data networks in the nineties and they got their asses kicked by the conventional telephony cos.  </p>
<p>I see no reason why Cisco or Google will understand the dynamics of RF modeling and diverse device, RPU or any of the many other factors that go into creating a successful wireless business.  Mark my words, I think a little silcon valley humble pie is going to be dished out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
